{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Cedric D'Hue

Hi Craig,

You raise some very interesting points regarding using a Roth IRA for college savings. I would like to raise some additional considerations. First, Proverbs 3:27-28 teaches us to not withhold good from those who deserve it. “27 Do not withhold good from those who deserve it, when it is in your power to act. 28 Do not say to your neighbor, “Come back later; I’ll give it tomorrow”— when you now have it with you.” Personally, I am concerned by our willingness to “hide” assets from those who provide us with benefits, the government, higher education, etc.

Second, your child has to have earned income in order to contribute to a Roth IRA. If your child doesn’t have earned income, Roth IRA is not an option.

Third, if you withdraw only contributions you are not investing, you are only setting money aside in a 0% interest account. If you withdraw gains, they you are hit with a 10% penalty and taxes.

Finally, if my child was preparing to graduate with student loans and with contributions in a Roth IRA, I would definitely consider advising my child to withdraw only contributions from the Roth in order to pay off/down the student loan debt. The Roth IRA gains would continue to grow and I would rather have my child make payments to their Roth than to a lender.

I hope this helps and I look forward to future comments.

As always, this is a heady area and you should seek the advice of a competent financial professional.

2 Gholmes

Interesting scenerio, have been enjoying your posts as they make me think. For me I really want to teach my kids not to use debt as a tool.

My other thought is what % of your income are you saving for retirement? We are using Dave Ramseys 15% as our bench mark and currently we wont hit the $10,000 either. I want to be a good steward and not hoard money when it could be used now nor do I want to get to end of life and be a burden when I had the opportunity to wisely save.

3 JoeTaxpayer

“Third, if you withdraw only contributions you are not investing, you are only setting money aside in a 0% interest account.”

Cedric – I’m sorry, this doesn’t sound quite right. If my child will need $100K in 20 years (to keep math easy) and I choose this route, at 10%/yr return, I’d have $286K. $100K for school, $186K to stay in the account for retirement. The gains stay in the account.

Craig, an interesting approach. So long as the investor doesn’t double count those funds. With a $16.5K 401(k) cap, most people can fund their retirement that way and have the Roth as you suggest. If they don’t have access to a 401(k), the IRA/Roth IRA may be all they’ll have.
The concept of Roth as dual purpose account makes sense. Even as emergency fund. If no emergency comes up, the money generates tax-free gains, if it does, no harm done.

4 Cedric D'Hue

Hi Joe,

Please allow me to clarify. With a Roth IRA, you could only withdraw contributions without penalty in order to pay for college.

You are correct. My analogy isn’t the same for gains. The gains from your contributions would still be in the Roth IRA. The gains in a Roth IRA would make the Roth IRA better than setting money in a 0% interest account. My analogy is the same for the contributions, because you couldn’t use the Roth IRA gains for college without penalty.

If there are two options to save for college: (1) a Coverdale or 529 where my contributions produce gains and I can use both the contributions and gains to pay for college, or (2) a Roth IRA which would penalize me from withdrawing gains, (1) tends to provide more benefit than (2) based on some of these considerations.

Thank you for the correction. By the way, I enjoy your Personal Finance by the Book blog.

Cedric

5 Craig

@Gholmes
We are in-line with the Ramsey suggestions – give or take a % here or there.

6 Craig

@Cedric
Thanks so much for your feedback.
The “hiding” assets is a very good point – one that I thought of when I wrote the article. I agree that using the plan I laid out would be intentionally deceptive and thus would not be a wise moral or ethical move. I guess it is strange that I even included it, because as I wrote the strategy I knew it was not one that I could ethically use. Just something I read and passed along. Perhaps in the future I shouldn’t pass along strategies that are unethical! What was I thinking?
If you saved with a Roth IRA those funds would not be considered as assets for the child’s first year of school simply because they are not included until withdrawn from your Roth – when you pay the first bill. At that point your financial aid would already be determined. If a person had a problem with this they could withdraw the money early in the summer before they even started making applications (but, they would have no idea how much would be qualified deductions because they would not know the total school bill). If a parent wants to let a child work through college to see what is left then this would provide a possible financial aid benefit.
In this post, what I am suggestion is using my Roth IRA as a savings vehicle not opening one from my child. As you said, the child must have an income to make Roth contributions. Sorry that I did not make this point more clearly.
On your third point, the Roth IRA will be gaining interest, but basically all I would be doing is saying I don’t want to take out the interest only the principle. Thus, funds in an education savings account and a Roth IRA would both earn the exact same amount of interest. For example, if I had $75,000 in contributions and $25,000 in gains when I pay for school I would just say I want this money to come out of the $75,000 portion of the $100,000.
Again, sorry for not making it clearer that the intention is to use my Roth IRA to save for them. Instead of making contributions to their ESA I would make the same amount of contributions to my Roth IRA.

7 Craig

@Cedric
I just replied to your last comment and then saw this one.
The biggest problem with the ESA or 529 is that they are not flexible if I don’t use the money for education. In my situation there is a good chance that my kids will not even go to school in the states (they are all Canadian and US citizens).
If I plan to take $30,000 out for their schooling and put in $22,000 then it is all a wash if I take the money ($30,000) out of a Roth or ESA – as long as I have contributed more than $30,000 to the Roth.
Thoughts?

8 LRGCHE

Craig
I’ve been struggling with how to manage our kids college savings. I had considered this approach in an all or nothing sort of way and decided against it and opened an ESA for our oldest (2.5). But the more I thought about how saving for our second (newborn) I was having trouble. We are pretty much following the Dave plan and are putting 15% into Roths and will be a little short of the $10K cap. So it was bothering me that I might be putting money into an ESA, not knowing how it may be needed (or not needed) by my children, but not maximizing our Roths.

This hybrid approach is the solution I needed. One ESA & max’d out Roths for our 2 kids. Thanks for the good write up.

@JoeTaxpayer “The concept of Roth as dual purpose account makes sense. Even as emergency fund. If no emergency comes up, the money generates tax-free gains, if it does, no harm done.”

Using as an EF, hadn’t thought about that at all, thanks for the idea.
.-= LRGCHE´s last blog ..lrgche: Approaching single digits on email on a Fri morning now that’s progress people! Ready for the weekend, just wish it would be a warm one #fb =-.

9 Cedric D'Hue

Hi Craig,

Your responses make perfect sense. Your proposed strategy could work well for parents who have over-contributed to retirement savings. No use in building bigger retirement barns.

Your second post regarding ESA and 529 plans as not flexible enough for your situation is very intriguging. I’m sorry I don’t quite follow the example though I am interested in discussing it further. I’ll send you an email.

10 Craig

If your income increases you will probably need to go with an ESA in the future, but for now using the hybrid approach sounds like it will work well for you too.

11 Muneer

You can withdraw money out of a Roth IRA for these below reasons without incurring a 10% penalty… which is a good piece of mind provided by roth ira plans.

8 Exceptions that Eliminate the 10% Early Withdrawal Penalty

There are 8 exceptions to the 10% early withdrawal penalty (i.e. withdrawals that are taken before the age of 59 and 1/2). They are for distributions that:

i) Are taken because of the IRA owner’s disability

ii) Are taken because of the IRA owner’s death

iii) Are a series of loan repayments made over the life expectancy of the IRA investor

iv) Are used to pay for unreimbursed medical expenses that exceed 7.5% of the adjusted gross income of the Roth IRA owner

v) Are used to pay for medical insurance premiums if the IRA investor has been unemployed for more than 12 weeks

vi) Are used to pay for the purchase of a principal residence (maximum of $10,000 can be withdrawn). Also, the IRA investor must not have previously owned a home within the last 24 months.

vii) Are used to pay for higher education expenses of the IRA owner or eligible dependants/family

viii) Are used to pay back taxes of an IRS levy placed against the IRA

12 Craig

@Muneer
Thanks for the helpful list. The flexibility on withdrawals is one of the best features of the Roth.

Leave a Comment

{ 4 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post:

Short Term Missions